1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
own perspective in his philosophy creates for himself a conflict of quality and quantity of happiness due to the variations and proportion of personality types. way to think about and interpret the world; different than any other of the 16 types. Thus, while an INTP may be made happy by the "cultivation of the mind," an INFP will be made happy by self- actualization, and an ESFP will be made happy through more hedonistic actions. What we find in a study of personality type is that not only are world views different between types, but fundamental motivations and, most important to our discussion, what makes different types happy is a cosmos apart. The mere fact that different types are made happy by different conduct is harmful to Utilitarianism. Though Utilitarianism may be correct to believe that happiness is a universal desire, what we find is that a certain and consistent percentage of the population can only be made happy by different means. Thus, while happiness may be an objective desire, it's grounds are not--they are subjective. we need to observe the percentage of the population composed of distinct temperament compose. It has been found that SJs make up 38% of the population, SPs 38%, NFs 12%, and NTs 12% of the worlds population (the different the population, e.g. INTPs = ~1%). Thus, what will make 38% of the population happy will not necessarily make the remaining 62% happy and may, in fact, make them unhappy. This is the conflict--Mill assumes that all individuals will be made happy by cultivation of the mind or "pleasures of the mind" but any MBTI research will show that 64% of the population (SJs & SPs) disagree. For the INTPs (~1%) this may be true, and this may be generally agreed on by both the NFs and NTs (24%). This percentage being correct, how does Mill intend to balance quantity and quality of happiness? Should we satisfy only the SPs and SJs, for they make up most of the population, or should we satisfy the happiness of the NFs and NTs since Mill would tend to favor what brings them happiness? We can not do a cost/benefit analysis of quality and quantity, for even though one temperament may compose a larger percentage of the population than another, we can never judge quality, for these variations in percentage of type occur for an evolutionary purpose and are entirely natural. To favor the happiness of one group and neglect the conflicting happiness of another group in favor of quantity of happiness (since quality is relative to each type) |
|||||
13. |