1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
that this is only due to the fact that they have no experience of pleasure of the mind. Do we really want only to be as good as animals or do we want to make use of our higher faculties and bring about greater happiness? To not do so, to not bring about our greatest happiness is immoral. From the above quotations, we can see that Mill highly values intelligence in order that individuals and society may best know what is moral and how to bring forth the greatest quantity and quality of happiness--i.e. one needs intelligence to be a moral judge. |
||||||||
above quotations of Mill we find continuous reference to intelligences, pleasure of the mind, desire
for knowledge, and the cultivation of the mind. Like Kant, Mill has fallen into the trap of
perspective. In order to experience the fullest happiness and to be the most moral, we find that Mill
has created the need for individuals like himself (like most philosophers, probably an INTP), those
who value intellectual pleasures of the mind over those of animal pleasures such as money and
|
||||||||
power6 |
||||||||
(Keirsey 1998, pg. 207). Thus, we find in the case of Mill (like that of Kant), perspective |
||||||||
infiltrating, unknowingly, into his philosophy. Mill's personality, which he regards a product of environment, and for which he has no psychological knowledge of why it is the way it is, automatically has assumed that all individuals think and value the way he does--or can. With this in mind, we understand why Mill valued so much the cultivation of the mind, intelligence, and pleasures of the mind. Had he been a different personality type, it is reasonable to assume that Mill |
||||||||
11. |